A trailer has been released for the next CoD game, World At War. It' set in the jungle during WW2. The developers behind Co3, Treyarch, are developing it, but using Infinity Ward's engine. Going back to WW2 seems like a strange decision, I really hope they don't fuck it up.
http://www.gametrailers.com/player/35412.html
i7 920@3.8 | GTX280 | HAF 932 | 6GB | Corsair 520W
Hazro 24" | Logitech Illuminated | G500 | Creative 2.0 | Nikon D3100
Going back to World War 2 does seem like a stupid idea, since the same settings and type of characters, etc will just be reused, and that trailer didn't look much different from COD3. Call of Duty isn't the sort of game that would have a future setting, so they should have gone for something like the Korean War or the Falklands, wars in between WW2 and the modern day, to add variety.
"If at first you don't succeed, spend a lot of money to have a professional do it for you."
My Battlelog
Well, if Infinity Ward make Call of Duty 6, I reckon they will probably set it in modern times again. Treyarch are probably only making Call of Duty 5 because Activision want to milk as much money out of the CoD "franchise" as possible.
It is so obvious that Infinity Ward's engine has been used there, it is basically Co
Agree with Chaz here that they should go to something in-between. They could go for the future, but all future set war games are a massive fail in my opinion.
Looks like it wont be comming out on ps3 then.
17:42 - Colonel Mitch |ATK|: DE IS NOT A NOOB
It should be, since COD3 ONLY came out for consoles, and this is made by the same developers.Originally Posted by Darkeagle
Looks like it wont be comming out on ps3 then.
"If at first you don't succeed, spend a lot of money to have a professional do it for you."
My Battlelog
Yeah, and they probably wouldn't accept an exclusive to a console due to the mass demand they get from all 3 platforms.
I'm pretty positive it will be, though I don't really care if it doesn't.
i7 920@3.8 | GTX280 | HAF 932 | 6GB | Corsair 520W
Hazro 24" | Logitech Illuminated | G500 | Creative 2.0 | Nikon D3100
I don't think you could do a Call of Duty for the Falklands war, since uhh, well purely for money reasons, most Americans don't even know there are group of islands called the Falklands, let alone there was a war. The Korean War? The weapons used were very similiar to WW2. Vietnam? No, just... no.
I think Infinity Ward will do another modern age game after CoD5, to be cynical, well they've killed Arabs and Russians in the last one. So this one would of course involves China or another Far Eastern power.
Or maybe fighting in the US in a new civil war after the rise to power from china?
Bit crap really realising two cod games in the same year, cant see that many people moving to this one unless its as good as COD2.
It luks like Medal of Honor where u start at Pearl Harbour and spend 90% of the game in the Jungle, pretty lame, flame thrower looks cool tho. Doesn't look like a game that would make it online but we'll wait and see
Last edited by Target; 25th June 2008 at 02:50 AM.
At least it's not the Europe part of the war. America vs. Japan is cool. I WANT A Co
Take that ya one-eyed, bomb-lobbin', cactus eatin', pot bellied, thug fat jigglin-chicken whoopin' big, back-stabbin lob-armed creepy spastic bloody, blind-eyed pashy little twitchy pickle-headed rocke- hoppin, potato-poppin' phony two-faced stealthy mutant bastard!
Go to your corner and think about what you've just said.I WANT A Co
I've played the old MOH games where you spend most of your time in a forest, they sucked so much.
vietnam wasnt even a proper war!! it was just americans getting bored and looking for trouble!!
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks