IMO this movie wasent great, fine action scenes but the storyline i was like WTF!!??!!, id give it a 5/10 it was ok, not great and not bad
IMO this movie wasent great, fine action scenes but the storyline i was like WTF!!??!!, id give it a 5/10 it was ok, not great and not bad
Originally Posted by Phantom
I enjoyed it, but majorly missed all of the old gadgets and such, and the story line wasn't too bad, but not one of the best. The action scenes were awesome and there some of the usual bond wit, but not enough IMO.
Chaz, her house was burned down when she was a kid, maybe where the burn comes from?
perhaps it is time to bring back Sean Connery?
"What we've got, is going to turn your brain into shit!"
Definatly worth changing bond if he just isnt up for the story line / charm of all the other bonds movies that make it a on going success.
I definately agree with you.
For me, i just don't feel that Daniel Craig is bond. He just doesn't portray bond the same way all the other actors have e.g. Brosnan or Connery did.
which is a shame..
"What we've got, is going to turn your brain into shit!"
I cant believe you put Brosnan with Connery tbh Daniel Craig is a good Bond he just got given a shite story line and the writers seemed to have missed all the classic parts that a bond film needs, mainly the amazin gadgets he gets!!
I have not seen this movie yet and I don't think I will, because I didn't like the last one and from what people are saying it's not that good. I also heard the intro music today and thought it was really bad, not like a classic bond intro song like golden eye or die another day.
Phantom said my last signature was a bit gay so i replaced it with this........
Daniel Craig is a good bond, he's just been given some not so good story lines.
Give him a few more chances and see how he fares with some bond gadgets.
saw this on weds and i came out like 'wtf?!'. imo the writers are trying not to be bond anymore, which is the worst posible thing u cud do. the lack of gadgets pissed me off, the fact that the storyline relies on knowledge of the past move annoyed me, something all the other bonds have never done, the plot jst wasnt bond-ish and the thing im most annoyed about, wheres the sex scene at the end? i wudnt even give it a 5, id give it more a 3, and the only reason it gets a 3 is the quality of acting and sfx
I agree with Midge, Casino Royale was a much better movie too.
i7 920@3.8 | GTX280 | HAF 932 | 6GB | Corsair 520W
Hazro 24" | Logitech Illuminated | G500 | Creative 2.0 | Nikon D3100
Nothing wrong with Daniel Craig but Quantom of solace was pure fail!
Fully enjoyed. Interesting change from the day of Golden eye etc. In my opinion it's not bond, it's different better in some ways, worse in others. It has the realism of a british film and less of the feel that it's an American film.
I found it interesting how I felt that bond could actually die in this film. I think Bond will be like this for a while yet, even if Daniel Craig leaves they'll replace him with a Bond similar to the gritty almost realistic one in this film.
To Glory, our free Fatherland
The stronghold of the friendship of peoples
Party of Lenin is the power of the people
It leads us to the triumph of Communism.
Through storms the sun of freedom shone to us
And the great Lenin lighted us the way
He raised peoples to the right cause
He inspired us for labour and for acts of heroism.
Like the fact that it only rained in London...
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks