Hutch: The Poll

[Chalex4]

After almost 4 months of Hutch being banned, the admins have decided that it is time to have an official vote as to whether he should be let back in.

I know that some of you took a liking to Hutch at i34, including Oricalcos at times, and this contributed a fair way in deciding to have this poll. I am well aware though that many of you still have your gripes with Hutch, but I do believe that he has improved hugely since he was banned. If you don't mind whether Hutch should be let back in, please decide between the "yes" or "no" answer.

So, please vote in the poll as to whether you would like to see him back in ATK. It will be a majority vote, so the choice with the largest amount of votes wins. If it was decided that Hutch should come back, the admins will not tolerate any misbehaviour from Hutch in any shape or form, and will not hold back from banning him yet again.

[VoX]

Voted yes for the pure reason that if he misbehaves, he's gone, no question so at least there's some incentive for him to behave.

It's worth giving him a chance, he may end up being awesome.

[CILLIT BANG]

vote no or else *shakes fist*

[Snerfs]

im scared of freddy...

[Chazlene]

Voted yes, since everyone deserves a second chance, and Hutch has improved a lot recently. But I do agree that if he does piss anyone off again he should be straight out again.

[Bloo]

Voted yes, for the same reason as VoX. If he does something wrong or causes trouble, we can get rid of him again.

(By extension, that applies to everyone, but most people behave anyway..)

[ez64]

Voting yes on the proposistion of a trial comeback basis not a full blown hello again all is forgiven.

[pewpew]

Bad hutch!!! Baaaad hutch.... we let him off with this... next thing he will be stealing sweets from children.. then whos knows what he will do!!!

BAD hutch!!! >

[Snerfs]

the admins will not tolerate any misbehaviour from Hutch in any shape or form, and will not hold back from banning him yet again.

shouldnt that happen to anyone anyway? -.-

[ez64]

Can we ban the people making accounts to vote?

And also people voting that have just joined the community is not fair.

Im not trying to be biased but please make this at least fair.

[VoX]

And using other peoples accounts.

All votes from new members will be discounted anyway, were not exactly stupid.

[Frost Wraith]

I would just like 2 say hutch use 2 give me crap for comeing on here saying how i just stalked freddie when i did not and well i never because i went 2 i34 with mint even though i spent time with atk but still i really did get upset alot of the time when he was bullying me

[ez64]

I would just like 2 say hutch use 2 give me crap for comeing on here saying how i just stalked freddie when i did not and well i never because i went 2 i34 with mint even though i spent time with atk but still i really did get upset alot of the time when he was bullying me

Fair nuff didnt know.

[pewpew]

im not new, i have 2 posts..

[Paper Tiger]

Voted no. Correct me if I'm wrong, but he was permantly banned?

Do I really have to link you lot to a dictionary defination of PERMANANT? Quoting Dictionary.com

1. existing perpetually; everlasting, esp. without significant change.
2. intended to exist or function for a long, indefinite period without regard to unforeseeable conditions: a permanent employee; the permanent headquarters of the United Nations.

This is my opinion. Flame me, ban me, punish me for it. I don't care. Freedom of speech and I freely express my opinion!

Need I say anymore?