Ok so if we redo it then
Snerfs fw mitch target - 4 in total - when the first poll was taken fw had about 3 posts
marshy bloo chalex ez64 chazlene - 5 in total..
why wasent the first poll used to unban him
Ok so if we redo it then
Snerfs fw mitch target - 4 in total - when the first poll was taken fw had about 3 posts
marshy bloo chalex ez64 chazlene - 5 in total..
why wasent the first poll used to unban him
From what i've heard/seen... hutch seems to be like me. Might be interesting to meet him.
Can we just get a new hutch back into atk post as in not a meeting to decide to have a meeting. Just straight up Should he be allowed back instantly not waiting 109 days just comming back right now.
Um. .....your forgetting me in the yes column and ez was in the yes rather than no. Far as I see, thats 6-4 in favor of keeping the ban
8 yes
3 no
-2 to yes
+2 to no
_________
6 Yes
5 No
pew pew wasnt hutch lol it was paul from the nest
I worked from marshy's example. Even so, both scenario's point to him remaining banned.
sorry, i'll rephrase that
8 unban
3 ban
-2 to unban
+2 to ban
_________
6 unban
5 ban
The poll is NOT unban, the Yes is for him to be unbanned after the 109 days *meeting*, I would have voted for that option.
I think he should be unbanned after 109 days. Mainly because I believe that everyone should be given a se- third chance, and I think that he'll try not to piss you guys off. He never pissed me off tbh.
Take that ya one-eyed, bomb-lobbin', cactus eatin', pot bellied, thug fat jigglin-chicken whoopin' big, back-stabbin lob-armed creepy spastic bloody, blind-eyed pashy little twitchy pickle-headed rocke- hoppin, potato-poppin' phony two-faced stealthy mutant bastard!
I think we should give him a one last chance type of thing. He dose anything wrong, anything at all, he gets banned for ever
17:42 - Colonel Mitch |ATK|: DE IS NOT A NOOB
Originally Posted by Marshy
Silent didn't have the best password protection in the world and me and John found a way past it, subsequently the above happened with John logging on as Marc and voting in the poll.
I agree with DE here, one last chance, if he's a smacktard, perma, and that means PERMA. (Wow, I'm caps-locking words that don't actually exist...)
Of course, those incidents were the controversies I was talking about last time...
The irony of that statement is beautiful, considering how this in my opinion is exactly the same thing you have done (though I admit, you're a lot less clingy than Hutch is, though the first time I observed it you did attempt the typical "well I'll make my own clan and it'll be better than yours!" but that was awhile ago so meh). On the whole though, when the exile, prisoner, banned user, soldier, whatever returns they will often try and make out that nothing has happened, it's a very human coping mechanism.
Last edited by Bloo; 3rd January 2009 at 01:12 PM.
We did give him a last chance - that was the one he blew when he got banned.
Which is also why I say se- Third chance ;D
Take that ya one-eyed, bomb-lobbin', cactus eatin', pot bellied, thug fat jigglin-chicken whoopin' big, back-stabbin lob-armed creepy spastic bloody, blind-eyed pashy little twitchy pickle-headed rocke- hoppin, potato-poppin' phony two-faced stealthy mutant bastard!
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks