@ VH and chris whilst this is true, this IS the new technology rising. In theory it should be the new wave starting from now.
@ DK - if you read any of the post you would realise as i said this is a different technology to the nvidia active shutter glasses. Also i should make a point that i tried the nvidia glasses at iLite and they were alot better than at i37, tho required silly frame rates to look smooth and in theory should be bad for long periods of use due to the physical flickering.
@ Vox - i noticed about the interleaving and thats the only thing im really unsure about, tho with a pixel size of significantly less than 1mm^2 in theory this shouldnt be noticable unless you get to within like 10cm of the screen.
The Zalman screen at i37 IIRC was just another 120Hz using active glasses, and it was early days of that technology too. The circular polarisation used but this interleaving technology is based on the same way a digital 3d cinema works.
Effectivley at the moment im looking for something to enhance my gaming experience. Ive started spending alot of time on WoW (due to lack of stuff to do mainly), and after playing a good half an hour of WoW on the nvidia 3d vision at iLite i must say the premise is significantly exciting, but I really dont want to get a cheap-o panel and a flawed and dying technology. During times when alot was going on (40 vs 40 battlegrounds for instance) when the frame rates dropped it became noticably "flickery" and I can see it being irritating for a 6 hour session :P, and considering with WoWs bad optimization (on full settings I only usually get around 45 fps dropping to 7-12 in raids when there are hundreds of effects on the screen) using my 4870 x2 with both cores maxed out I really dont think active is something I want to look into.







Reply With Quote
Bookmarks