Suggestion: Server wise

[Snerfs]

were on about the TF2 server, but yes Mr. Big, i never see it active at all with a top of 2 or 3 people at most. and the TF2 server havent been busy at all for weeks or months has it?

[silentlord.2008]

were on about the TF2 server, but yes Mr. Big, i never see it active at all with a top of 2 or 3 people at most. and the TF2 server havent been busy at all for weeks or months has it?

i aggree

[the witch]

First post in ages, but if the servers are not being used to there full potential why not do something about it? i.e. make a scheduler on when community games will be held on the servers, and let people add there names to it. An example of what i mean can be seen here:

example1
example2
example3

This will not only help get the servers populated but it will make everyone feel more involded and help bring members togather , it can also be used for non server based games such as starcraft or dawn of war.
Alternitivly why not give a community-based clan admin rites on the server and allow them to use it for matches etc that way it will become populated aswell as a giving us the potential to gain more members.

In my opinion i feel that the problems not that the servers arnt populated but as a community we only really use the fourms and teamspeak with a few of us meeting to play css like games, we dont really play any games as a whole community and thats why we dont have many new members. I also feel that we put to much responsibility on chalex to organise things , yes he is the head admin but theres no reason why we cant start a thread and see if people want to play a game of dow or something. If only two people are intrested its still a start...

[Isphera]

Alternitivly why not give a community-based clan admin rites on the server and allow them to use it for matches etc that way it will become populated aswell as a giving us the potential to gain more members.

Problem with this is that if the wrong people are given admin, and they subseqently misuse it, then it is likely to end up with events similar to those currently occuring.

And with the scheduler - I agree that it is a good idea, but I see two problem's with it. One, is it relatively simple to use, set up, read and participate in, and Two, even if events were scheduled a week in advance, it is unlikely that a substantial will 'attend', because it may be a time that they are unavailible for, or that they just don't want to play that game at that particular moment.

Honestly, a more 'ad-hoc' approach seems to fit the community rather than using an infrastructurial system. (If infrastructurial is a word)